The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient opinions regarding the Veteran's right eye condition and underlying blood disorder. The case will be returned for further examination and opinion.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for additional medical opinions to address the issues of service connection and the presence of an underlying blood disorder.
- Claimed conditions
- Right eye condition, Polycythemia
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 26, 2024
- Citation
- 24004021
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 1,836 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24004021.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's generalized anxiety disorder is related to his military service and granted effective September 17, 2024. The claim for polycythemia is remanded due to a duty to assist error.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to pre-decisional duty to assist errors, including a lack of VA treatment records and an inadequate medical opinion. The Veteran's claim will be reconsidered with all available evidence.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for a right eye condition and an acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD and depression. The decision found that there was no evidence of aggravation of pre-existing conditions during service and that the Veteran did not have a current psychiatric condition at any time during or approximate to the pendency of the claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is rated at 40 percent, and the Board has found that a higher rating is not warranted. The right eye condition issue is remanded for further examination and opinion.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.