An effective date of October 5, 2014, but not earlier, for the grant of service connection for renal cell carcinoma as due to exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune is granted.,An effective date of April 17, 2006, but not earlier, for the award of SMC on account of loss of use of a creative organ is granted.,An effective date of October 5, 2014, but not earlier, for the grant of service connection for left lung cancer as secondary to renal cell carcinoma is granted.,An effective date of October 5, 2014, but not earlier, for the award of SMC based on the housebound rate is granted.,The initial rating higher than 60 percent for renal cell carcinoma status post right nephrectomy is denied.
The deciding factor: Service connection was granted on a direct basis and an effective date of October 5, 2014, is warranted as well.,SMC on account of loss of use of a creative organ due to erectile dysfunction should have been assigned the same effective date as the grant of service connection for diabetes mellitus with erectile dysfunction.,The Veteran's renal cell carcinoma was not active during the pendency of the claim from October 5, 2014. The disease did not manifest by persistent edema and albuminuria with BUN 40 to 80mg%, creatinine 4 to 8mg%, or generalized poor health characterized by lethargy, weakness, anorexia, weight loss, or limitation of exertion (the criteria for an 80 percent rating); or, requiring regular dialysis or precluding more than sedentary activity, or BUN more than 80mg%, creatinine more than 8mg%, or markedly decreased function of kidney or other organ systems (the criteria for a maximum 100 percent rating).,The Veteran died prior to the revised rating criteria coming into effect on November 14, 2021. As such, the new criteria are not applicable in this case.
- Claimed conditions
- renal cell carcinoma, left lung cancer
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Camp Lejeune water
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 29, 2024
- Citation
- 24004352
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 913 · Granted: 41% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24004352.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
Your appeal for service connection for renal cell carcinoma with partial nephrectomy has been dismissed because the issue was already validly appealed in a previous docket number.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for renal cell carcinoma with partial nephrectomy is remanded due to a lack of development regarding the relationship between his hypertension and the cancer. The AOJ must obtain an addendum opinion from an appropriate physician to determine if the Veteran's hypertension caused or aggravated his renal cell carcinoma.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for renal cell carcinoma is remanded due to the lack of a reasoned medical explanation connecting the facts of his case.
- Denied
The Board has denied the readjudication of service connection for diabetes mellitus, prostate cancer, and renal cell carcinoma. The appeal regarding PTSD was withdrawn by the Veteran.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.