Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claims for service connection for varicose veins and basal cell carcinoma have been denied. The Board has remanded the claim for degenerative joint disease (to include osteoarthritis).,Service connection for varicose veins is denied as there is no evidence of a current disability related to active duty, and the Veteran's condition is more likely caused by risk factors such as obesity and age.,Service connection for basal cell carcinoma is denied due to lack of in-service exposure to Agent Orange and insufficient medical opinion supporting a link between the condition and service.

The deciding factor: The Board found that there was no evidence linking the Veteran's current varicose veins or basal cell carcinoma to his active duty service, including exposure to herbicides. The degenerative joint disease claim is remanded for further examination as it involves a complex medical issue.,For varicose veins, the Board noted that while the Veteran had a history of treatment and diagnosis, there was no in-service incident or connection to his hypertension. For basal cell carcinoma, the lack of exposure to Agent Orange and insufficient medical opinion against a link with service were key factors.,The degenerative joint disease claim is remanded as it involves multiple joints (back, right hip, bilateral knees, both hands) and requires an examination to determine if any current diagnoses are related to his active duty service.

Claimed conditions
varicose veins, basal cell carcinoma, degenerative joint disease (to include osteoarthritis)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 31, 2024
Citation
24004810

Veterans Law Judge

S. CHARLES NEILL

Decisions by this judge: 910 · Granted: 31% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24004810.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.