Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claim for service connection for a right knee disability is being reopened and granted.,Service connection for diarrhea as a qualifying chronic disability under the PACT Act is granted.,GERD, sinus disability, residuals of a nasal fracture, jaw disability, neck disability, and back disability are all remanded for further development due to the provisions of the PACT Act regarding toxic exposure risk activity (TERA).,Bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy secondary to service-connected back disability is also being remanded.,

The deciding factor: The Veteran submitted new and material evidence that relates to an unestablished fact necessary to substantiate the claim of a right knee disability, which was not present at the time of the previous denial.,The Veteran's diarrhea is considered a qualifying chronic disability under the PACT Act due to his service in the Southwest Asia theater of operations. The VA examiner could not attribute the condition to any known clinical diagnosis and provided no nexus opinion regarding the relationship between the current disability and service.,GERD, sinus disability, residuals of a nasal fracture, jaw disability, neck disability, and back disability are all remanded due to the provisions of the PACT Act regarding toxic exposure risk activity (TERA).,Bilateral lower extremity radiculopathy secondary to service-connected back disability is also being remanded.,

Claimed conditions
Right Knee Disability, Diarrhea, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Sinus Disability, Residuals of a Nasal Fracture, Jaw Disability, Neck Disability, Right Hip Disability, Back Disability, Bilateral Lower Extremity Radiculopathy
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 2, 2024
Citation
24005432

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24005432.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.