The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate opinions regarding service connection for the Veteran's cause of death and the etiology of his fatal malignant neoplasm. The VA needs to obtain additional medical opinions that consider both herbicide agent exposure, asbestos exposure, and toxic exposure risk activities during service.
The deciding factor: The Board found the previous opinions lacking in addressing the specific facts of the case and the Veteran's individual circumstances.
- Claimed conditions
- malignant neoplasm
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 5, 2024
- Citation
- 24006175
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24006175.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for additional development due to inadequate VA examination in November 2021. The Veteran needs a new VA examination to determine the current level of severity of his service-connected lung disability.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's death at a private hospital is being reviewed for eligibility for VA burial benefits. The appellant contends that the Veteran was under VA-contracted care at the time of his death, but VA records are needed to confirm this. She must provide any additional medical records pertinent to her claim.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded several issues related to the Veteran's service connection claims, reopening of claims, and effective dates for TDIU. The main issue is the assignment of an effective date prior to July 30, 2013 for granulomatous infection with pulmonary nodule, left upper lobe.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for lung cancer, finding that there was no evidence linking the condition to his active duty periods. The lung cancer was determined to have existed prior to these periods and did not show any aggravation during them.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.