Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for a separate and compensable disability rating for erectile dysfunction associated with type II diabetes mellitus is denied.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for pancreatitis, to include as associated with type II diabetes mellitus is remanded due to inadequate VA examination.,The Veteran's claim for an initial disability rating in excess of 20 percent for type II diabetes mellitus prior to September 10, 2021 is remanded due to missing private treatment records and inadequate VA examination.,The Veteran's claim for a disability rating in excess of 40 percent for type II diabetes mellitus from September 10, 2021 is remanded due to missing private treatment records and inadequate VA examination.,The Veteran's claim for a separate and compensable disability rating for bilateral diabetic retinopathy associated with type II diabetes mellitus prior to September 10, 2021 is remanded due to inadequate VA examination.,The Veteran's claim for a disability rating in excess of 10 percent for bilateral diabetic retinopathy associated with type II diabetes mellitus from September 10, 2021 is remanded due to inadequate VA examination.

The deciding factor: The July 2017 VA examination did not provide an adequate medical opinion regarding the Veteran's erectile dysfunction.,The July 2017 VA examination was inadequate as it did not address whether the Veteran's pancreatitis is proximately due to or the result of his service-connected diabetes mellitus, and did not consider if the Veteran's cataracts were aggravated by a service-connected disability.,Missing private treatment records are required for an adequate evaluation of the Veteran's type II diabetes mellitus.,Missing private treatment records are required for an adequate evaluation of the Veteran's type II diabetes mellitus.,The July 2017 and October 2021 VA examinations were internally inconsistent, with both stating that the Veteran does not have a visual field defect but also reflecting visual field defects on their respective examination charts.,Missing private treatment records are required for an adequate evaluation of the Veteran's bilateral diabetic retinopathy.

Claimed conditions
Erectile Dysfunction, Pancreatitis, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, Bilateral Diabetic Retinopathy
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
February 5, 2024
Citation
24006187

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24006187.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.