The Board has remanded the case for further consideration of a TDIU on an extraschedular basis and a rating in excess of 40 percent for the service-connected right upper extremity disability.
The deciding factor: The Board found that the Veteran's claim for a TDIU was not properly addressed due to a lack of analysis regarding her employment history prior to remanding it.
- Claimed conditions
- right upper extremity disability (including neurological disorder), status post fracture, right scaphoid, tear of triangular fibrocartilage with carpal tunnel syndrome, traumatic arthritis of the right wrist
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- February 15, 2024
- Citation
- 24008003
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 24008003.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's dental disorder and traumatic arthritis of the right wrist are being remanded for further evaluation. The TDIU claim is also being remanded due to a recent job loss.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to questions regarding secondary service connection for traumatic arthritis of the right wrist, which was previously granted as service-connected navicular fracture. The Veteran needs updated VA treatment records and a VA opinion on whether the arthritis is caused or aggravated by the service-connected condition.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for microscopic hematuria was previously denied in a final rating decision. The RO found that the evidence did not demonstrate an actually disabling condition. His claim for increased rating of traumatic arthritis of the right wrist remains denied.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The veteran's appeal involves claims for increased ratings for traumatic arthritis of the right wrist and ankle, as well as a TDIU claim. The case is being remanded to obtain additional medical examinations and records.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.