The Veteran's asbestosis with COPD, along with other service-connected conditions, has been granted a 100% rating effective August 15, 2018. The decision also grants special monthly compensation (SMC) under 38 U.S.C. § 1114(s).
The deciding factor: The Veteran's asbestosis with COPD was found to meet the criteria for a 100% rating based on maximum exercise capacity less than 15 ml/kg/min oxygen consumption with cardiorespiratory limitation.
- Claimed conditions
- Asbestosis with COPD, Pulmonary Hypertension, Bronchiectasis, Pulmonary Nodule
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 100%
- Decision date
- February 20, 2024
- Citation
- 24008283
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24008283.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's COPD is etiologically related to service exposure to herbicide agents, and thus grants service connection for COPD.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for service connection for pulmonary hypertension is remanded due to inconsistencies in the VA examination findings. The examiner must clarify whether the Veteran has a current diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension and determine if it is related to his military service.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim of CUE in the December 2005 rating decision that assigned a 60 percent initial disability rating for cardiomyopathy with pulmonary hypertension, finding no clear and unmistakable error.
- Granted
The Board restored service connection for pulmonary hypertension as the AOJ's severance decision was improper due to a lack of clear and unmistakable error.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.