The Board has ordered the case to be remanded due to a lack of compliance with prior remand instructions regarding the relationship between the Veteran's refractive error and any superimposed disease or injury during service.
The deciding factor: The addendum opinion is needed to address whether the Veteran's refractive error was subject to a superimposed disease or injury that resulted in additional disability of the eye.
- Claimed conditions
- refractive error of the left eye
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 27, 2024
- Citation
- 24009247
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24009247.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for the veteran's refractive error of the left eye, finding no evidence linking it to service or a service-connected condition.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA medical opinions regarding the relationship between his service-connected residuals of left orbital lobe fracture with diplopia and other diagnosed conditions. The TDIU issue prior to July 8, 2016, will also be referred to the Director, Compensation Service, for extraschedular consideration.
- Denied
The Board has denied service connection for refractive error of the left eye, finding that it is attributable to diabetic retinopathy, which is already service-connected.
- Partly granted
The Board has denied service connection for the Veteran's claimed conditions, finding that they are not secondary to his service-connected hypertension. The case is remanded for further development regarding refractive error of the left eye.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.