The Board has remanded the cases for additional development.,Issues related to pericardial cyst, lung disability (including asthma), and bilateral eye disorder are still pending.
The deciding factor: The claims have been remanded due to insufficient evidence and need further examination and analysis.
- Claimed conditions
- low white blood cell count disorder (to include anemia), pericardial cyst, lung disability (to include asthma), bilateral eye disorder (other than bilateral dry eye syndrome and macular degeneration)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 28, 2024
- Citation
- 24009506
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24009506.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases due to inadequate VA examinations and the need for further development. The Veteran's pericardial cyst is being reviewed, as well as his bilateral eye disorder.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to insufficient medical opinions regarding the Veteran's conditions and their relationship to his military service, specifically herbicide agent exposure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for various disabilities, including low white blood cell count, skin, colon polyps, pericardial cyst, prostate and respiratory/lung disabilities, due to a lack of substantial compliance with previous remand instructions. The VA examiners were not provided adequate rationale in their opinions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to conflicting opinions in a previous VA examination. The Veteran will need new examinations and records to determine if his disabilities are related to herbicide exposure during service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.