Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable disability rating for scar of the lower back, residual of laminectomy is denied.,The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for right eye retinal detachment with diplopia, bilateral iritis and status post bilateral cataract extraction are remanded. The Veteran must provide VA with any private treatment records not already in the file.,The Veteran's claim for an initial disability rating in excess of 10 percent for lumbar spine with degenerative disc disease, degenerative arthritis, status post laminectomy, ankylosing spondylitis, and bilateral sacroiliac arthritis is remanded. The Veteran must provide VA with any private treatment records not already in the file.

The deciding factor: The evidence of record does not support a compensable rating for the scar of the lower back, residual of laminectomy.,Further examination and evaluation are needed to determine the current severity and a retrospective opinion throughout the period on appeal for the service-connected eye disabilities.,Further examination and evaluation are needed to determine the current severity and a retrospective opinion throughout the period on appeal for the service-connected lumbar spine with degenerative disc disease, degenerative arthritis, status post laminectomy, ankylosing spondylitis, and bilateral sacroiliac arthritis.

Claimed conditions
scar of the lower back, residual of laminectomy, right eye retinal detachment with diplopia, bilateral iritis and status post bilateral cataract extraction, lumbar spine with degenerative disc disease, degenerative arthritis, status post laminectomy, ankylosing spondylitis, and bilateral sacroiliac arthritis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 4, 2024
Citation
24010407

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24010407.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.