The Veteran's claim for service connection for residuals of a shell fragment wound to Muscle Group XVII was granted with an effective date of June 24, 1977. The Veteran had previously filed his original claim on that same day.
The deciding factor: The decision found CUE in the April 1978 Rating Decision and August 2005 Rating Decision for not granting service connection for additional residuals related to the shell fragment wound, including muscle atrophy and weakness.
- Claimed conditions
- Muscle Group XVII
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 20%
- Decision date
- March 5, 2024
- Citation
- 24010460
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24010460.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for the residuals of an injury to Muscle Group XVII as a result of a gunshot wound to the buttocks was denied by the Board, with no current muscle or functional disability found.
- Granted
The veteran's hypothetical entitlement to a total disability rating for the requisite period of time due to service-connected disabilities has been established, allowing for DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1318.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the veteran's service-connected residuals of a gunshot wound to the left hip and buttock do not warrant an increased rating beyond the current 20 percent, as his symptoms are indicative of moderate injury. A separate additional 10 percent rating is granted for mild incomplete paralysis of the left sciatic nerve.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and providing proper notice regarding secondary service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.