The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 due to errors in obtaining pre-decisional duty-to-assist information and records, as well as for an addendum VA medical opinion addressing all theories of entitlement raised by the Veteran.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there were errors in obtaining necessary records and requested additional assistance from the AOJ to correct these issues.
- Claimed conditions
- gall bladder condition, prostate condition, psychological condition
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 6, 2024
- Citation
- 24010754
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24010754.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's tinnitus is granted service connection. The Board finds the evidence insufficient to grant service connection for diabetes mellitus type II, hypertension, peripheral neuropathy, erectile dysfunction, prostate condition, headaches, IBS, behavioral neurology conditions, and acquired psychological condition due to exposure at Camp Lejeune.
- Denied
The Veteran's CAD, hypertension, prostate condition, and strokes were not shown to be related to service or any incident therein.,Service connection for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), secondary to the Veteran's strokes, was also denied.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeals for erectile dysfunction and prostate condition have been withdrawn, resulting in the dismissal of these claims.,The appeal regarding a rating in excess of 50 percent for an acquired psychiatric disorder has been denied. The Veteran's left lower extremity radiculopathy ratings have been restored to 10%, while his right lower extremity radiculopathy ratings remain at 10%. Appeals for higher initial disability ratings for both lower extremity radiculopathies were also denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has denied service connection for bruising due to lack of a current diagnosis. The claims for breast tumors, gall bladder condition, and colon polyps are remanded as the evidence does not include an opinion on their relationship to active duty service or any toxic exposures.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.