The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for an eye disability other than dry eye syndrome, bilateral pinguecula, and bilateral cataracts. The VA reviewing clinician found that the Veteran's conditions are not related to his military service or exposure to herbicide agents.
The deciding factor: The VA reviewing clinician determined that the Veteran's eye disabilities (arcus senilis, chorioretinal scar, hyperopic astigmatism) were not caused by his military service or exposure to herbicide agents and are unrelated to diabetes.
- Claimed conditions
- arcus senilis, chorioretinal scar (right eye), hyperopic astigmatism
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 6, 2024
- Citation
- 24010808
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 24010808.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for hypertension, arcus senilis, eczema, and abdominal pain due to additional pertinent evidence being added to the record after the last Supplemental Statement of the Case.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The claim for a compensable rating for dry eye syndrome was dismissed due to untimely filing of the Notice of Disagreement (NOD). The Board will remand the service connection claim for an eye disorder, including corneal ulcer, pterygium, pinguecula, retinal fibrosis, arcus senilis, anterior toxic cortical cataract, superficial punctate keratitis (SPK), and visual field constriction.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of a bilateral eye disability, including cataracts and other ocular conditions, has been dismissed due to the Veteran's death.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for a left eye condition claimed as left eye uveitis and diagnosed as acquired absence of the eye, presence of artificial eye, arcus senilis, and blindness due to lack of evidence showing it began during active service or is related to an in-service injury.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.