The Board has ordered remand for additional development to locate service records and determine if the Veteran participated in a toxic exposure risk activity (TERA). A medical opinion is needed regarding the etiology of gout of the upper and lower extremities, including whether it is related to service or aggravated by a service-connected condition.
The deciding factor: The Board ordered remand due to incomplete records and potential participation in a TERA that may require additional examination and opinion.
- Claimed conditions
- gout of the upper extremities, gout of the lower extremities
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 7, 2024
- Citation
- 24011102
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24011102.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The appeal for service connection for various conditions, including right foot bone fractures, gout of the lower extremities, high blood pressure, and others, was dismissed due to the Veteran's withdrawal of all claims except his hypertension claim.
- Denied
The Veteran's death was not due to a service-connected disability. The Board denied DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1318 because the Veteran did not meet the criteria for total disability for at least 10 years prior to his death.
- Granted
The Board of Veterans' Appeals has granted service connection for PTSD and Mood Disorders, both presumed conditions under the PACT Act.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.