The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's plantar fasciitis fibromatosis and its relationship to service, particularly in light of a recently granted service connection for Dupuytren's contracture (palmar fibromatosis).
The deciding factor: The Board found that the current medical opinion was inadequate as it did not address the Veteran's lay reports of foot symptoms in service and continuing symptoms since separation.
- Claimed conditions
- plantar fasciitis fibromatosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 11, 2024
- Citation
- 24011350
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24011350.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection due to his reported cellulitis in service, which may have caused or contributed to his current peripheral neuropathy and somatic dysfunction of the thoracic region. The Veteran is seeking service connection for these conditions based on their onset during active duty.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for Dupuytren's contracture of the right and left hands, as well as plantar fasciitis fibromatosis, are being remanded due to the need for additional medical examinations and opinions.
- Granted
The Veteran's service connection claims for radiculopathy of the left and right lower extremities, as well as his TDIU claim, have been granted. His increased rating for bilateral plantar fasciitis fibromatosis has also been granted with a 20% evaluation effective October 28, 2013.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.