The Board has denied the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for left leg numbness and right leg numbness associated with the sciatic nerve. The Court found that there was not substantial compliance with previous remand orders, specifically regarding obtaining private treatment records from providers through the Community Care program. As a result, the case is being remanded to comply with these orders.
The deciding factor: The Court determined that the Board did not obtain all necessary private treatment records as instructed in prior remand orders.
- Claimed conditions
- left leg numbness associated with the sciatic nerve, right leg numbness associated with the sciatic nerve prior to March 1, 2019
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 28, 2024
- Citation
- 24013114
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24013114.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied entitlement to a rating in excess of 10 percent for left leg numbness associated with the sciatic nerve and right leg numbness associated with the sciatic nerve prior to March 1, 2019.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for increased ratings for bilateral leg numbness associated with the sciatic nerve due to additional development needed, including obtaining private medical records and a VA examination.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.