The Board has determined that the severance of service connection for right eye retrobulbar neuritis with amaurosis from November 17, 1999 was not properly made due to missing evidence. The Veteran's claim file does not contain all of the underlying evidence relied on by the AOJ in making this decision.
The deciding factor: The Board found that there were missing records related to the investigation and therefore could not determine if fraud occurred as required for severance of service connection.
- Claimed conditions
- right eye retrobulbar neuritis, blindness in both eyes
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 28, 2024
- Citation
- A24015108
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24015108.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board found clear and unmistakable error in the grant of service connection for right eye retrobulbar neuritis (previously diagnosed as amaurosis), leading to its severance. The Veteran's claim was denied.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not meet the criteria for financial assistance for specially adapted housing or special home adaptation due to lack of loss of use of extremities, blindness, or burns.
- Partly granted
The Board granted entitlement to Special Monthly Compensation (SMC) based on blindness in both eyes and remanded the issue of service connection for sarcoidosis due to a pre-decisional duty-to-assist error.
- Denied
The Board denied compensation under the provisions of 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for additional disabilities resulting from treatment at a VA facility, finding that there was no evidence of additional disability proximately caused by carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault on the part of VA.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.