The Board has determined that the Veteran's death was due to cerebral hypoxemia, cardiorespiratory failure, oat cell lung cancer, and asbestosis. The claim is being remanded for further development including a VA examination and medical opinion regarding service connection.
The deciding factor: The decision is based on the need for additional evidence and clarification of the Veteran's exposure to asbestos during service.
- Claimed conditions
- Cerebral hypoxemia, Cardiorespiratory failure, Oat cell lung cancer, Asbestosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 11, 2024
- Citation
- 24015664
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24015664.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's TBI alone rendered him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation, and he is eligible for SMC at the housebound rate due to his single total disability rating with additional disabilities rated at least 60 percent.
- Dismissed
The appeal for an initial compensable disability rating for service-connected hearing loss is dismissed. An initial 30 percent disability rating for asbestosis is granted.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for an earlier effective date for a 100% disability rating for service-connected interstitial lung disease (ILD) and asbestosis has been dismissed due to the appellant's withdrawal of the appeal.
- Denied
The Veteran's asbestosis is rated at 10 percent, and the Board found that a higher rating is not warranted based on post-bronchodilator FVC scores.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.