The Board has remanded the case due to deficiencies in a previous opinion and the need for additional evidence.
The deciding factor: The previous opinion was inadequate as it did not consider all competent lay reports regarding the Veteran's skin condition or discuss the medical article submitted by the appellant.
- Claimed conditions
- lower extremity cellulitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 15, 2024
- Citation
- 24016062
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24016062.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for lower extremity cellulitis because the condition was not manifest in service and is otherwise unrelated to service.
- Denied
The Veteran's vascular problems, kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, and lower extremity cellulitis are not service-connected.,There is no evidence of hypertension or hypotension on active duty or within one year of separation from service. The sepsis that caused the Veteran's death was not related to his service.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection of lower extremity cellulitis, finding that there was no evidence linking the condition to his time in service.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a higher rating for his lower extremity cellulitis with brawny pigmentation of the pre-tibial area with left leg stasis dermatitis prior to November 22, 2019 and in excess of 60 percent thereafter has been denied. The evidence does not show that the condition more nearly approximates more than 40 percent of the entire body or more than 40 percent of exposed areas affected, nor did he have constant or near-constant systemic therapy during a 12-month period.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.