Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's CAD resulted in more than one episode of acute congestive heart failure or a workload greater than 3 METs resulting in symptoms like dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope from January 31, 2012 to October 4, 2014. The Veteran's condition did not meet the criteria for a higher rating during this period.

The deciding factor: The evidence showed that the Veteran experienced symptoms like dyspnea and fatigue at exertion levels between 3-5 METs, which met the criteria for a 60% rating under VA regulations.

Claimed conditions
coronary artery disease (CAD)
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
60%
Decision date
April 15, 2024
Citation
24016139

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24016139.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.