Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's cervical spine condition, diagnosed as degenerative arthritis of the spine and cervical strain, is related to service. The Board finds that there was a pre-decisional duty to assist error in not providing an adequate VA examination and medical opinion.,The Veteran's rib condition, diagnosed as a hairline fracture due to jump from a Black Hawk, is related to service. The Board finds that there was a pre-decisional duty to assist error in not providing an adequate VA examination and medical opinion.,The Veteran's sleep apnea is related to service. The Board finds that there was a pre-decisional duty to assist error in not providing an adequate VA examination and medical opinion.,The Veteran's left femur condition, diagnosed as a femur injury in 1987, is related to service. The Board finds that there was a pre-decisional duty to assist error in not providing an adequate VA examination and medical opinion.,The Veteran's right-hand condition, diagnosed as dupuytren's contracture with lacerations, is related to service. The Board finds that there was a pre-decisional duty to assist error in not providing an adequate VA examination and medical opinion.,The Veteran's left-hand condition, diagnosed as dupuytren's contracture with lacerations and osteopenia, is related to service. The Board finds that there was a pre-decisional duty to assist error in not providing an adequate VA examination and medical opinion.,The Veteran's right wrist condition, diagnosed as lacerations of the right forearm/hand, is related to service. The Board finds that there was a pre-decisional duty to assist error in not providing an adequate VA examination and medical opinion.,The Veteran's left wrist condition, diagnosed as lacerations of the left forearm/hand, is related to service. The Board finds that there was a pre-decisional duty to assist error in not providing an adequate VA examination and medical opinion.

The deciding factor: There was a failure to provide an adequate nexus opinion linking the Veteran's cervical spine condition to his periods of active service.,There was a failure to provide an adequate nexus opinion linking the Veteran's rib condition to his period of active service.,There was a failure to provide an adequate medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's sleep apnea is related to his military service.,There was a failure to provide an adequate VA examination and medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's left femur condition is related to his periods of active service.,There was a failure to provide an adequate VA examination and medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's right-hand condition is related to his periods of active service.,There was a failure to provide an adequate VA examination and medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's left-hand condition is related to his periods of active service.,There was a failure to provide an adequate VA examination and medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's right wrist condition is related to his periods of active service.,There was a failure to provide an adequate VA examination and medical opinion regarding whether the Veteran's left wrist condition is related to his periods of active service.

Claimed conditions
Cervical spine condition (cervical strain with degenerative arthritis), Rib condition (cracked rib), Sleep apnea, Left femur condition (femur injury), Right-hand condition (dupuytren's contracture with lacerations), Left-hand condition (dupuytren's contracture with lacerations and osteopenia), Right wrist condition, Left wrist condition
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 17, 2024
Citation
A24019063

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24019063.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.