The Veteran withdrew his appeal regarding the issue of entitlement to service connection for frostbite of bilateral feet before a decision was made.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's representative requested withdrawal of the appeal pertaining to the issue of frostbite of bilateral feet, and this request was received by the Board prior to any decision being made.
- Claimed conditions
- frostbite of bilateral feet
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 24, 2024
- Citation
- A24020803
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24020803.
What this means for you
A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims of service connection for frostbite on the bilateral feet, a back condition, and left knee replacement due to insufficient evidence in the record.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for additional development, including obtaining service treatment and personnel records, scheduling a VA examination for the right shoulder disability, and clarifying numbness in the Veteran's feet. The issues of entitlement to service connection for a right shoulder disability and frostbite of the bilateral feet are still pending.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development and consideration. The Veteran's claims for service connection for frostbite of bilateral feet and hepatitis are denied due to lack of evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran incurred left knee injuries during ACDUTRA and active duty, which are service-connected. However, there is no evidence of frostbite of bilateral feet in service or currently diagnosed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.