Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board has determined that the October 2020 substantive appeal to the February 2019 Statement of the Case was timely filed, as rebutting evidence shows the VA did not follow its regular mailing practices for including the address of the Veteran's representative in the carbon copy line.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's representative provided clear evidence that the AOJ did not follow its regular mailing practices by omitting the address of the representative in the carbon copy line, thus rebutting the presumption of regularity.

Claimed conditions
MDD
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
May 9, 2024
Citation
A24024277

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24024277.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.