The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for type II diabetes mellitus (DM2) as there is no evidence that it was incurred in or caused by his military service, including exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not establish a link between the Veteran's DM2 and his military service, particularly his limited exposure to contaminated water at Camp LeJeune during his active duty.
- Claimed conditions
- type II diabetes mellitus (DM2)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 14, 2024
- Citation
- A24024996
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24024996.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded all claims for service connection due to less than substantial compliance with previous remand directives.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand several claims for further development and review, including those related to AL amyloidosis, angioedema, respiratory disorders, type II diabetes mellitus, and neurological disorders.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims of service connection for colon cancer, prostate cancer, ischemic heart disease (IHD), and type II diabetes mellitus (DM2). The decision is based on insufficient evidence regarding the Veteran's exposure to herbicide agents during his military service.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities rendered him unable to obtain and maintain substantially gainful employment, but he was not in need of nursing home care or permanent housebound status. He is granted SMC based on the need for aid and attendance by another.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.