The Veteran's bilateral posterior tibial tendonitis is granted as service connected. The Board found new and relevant evidence sufficient to readjudicate the claim, including a private provider's opinion linking her current condition to military service.
The deciding factor: A private provider provided an opinion establishing a nexus between the Veteran's current bilateral foot condition and her military service.
- Claimed conditions
- bilateral posterior tibial tendonitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 4, 2024
- Citation
- A24028857
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24028857.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further development, including a VA examination to evaluate the service-connected bilateral pes planus and any additional diagnosed disabilities of the feet. The Veteran's representative provided additional argument in October 2014.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for service connection for fibromyalgia, bilateral posterior tibial tendonitis, and residuals of frostbite of the second toe of the left foot as secondary to his service-connected bilateral pes planus with plantar fasciitis. The Veteran was also denied an increased rating for pseudofolliculitis barbae.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for higher evaluations for his service-connected bilateral posterior tibial tendonitis, finding that the disability did not meet or approximate criteria warranting a rating in excess of 10 percent.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.