Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Veteran's coronary artery disease is currently rated as 30 percent disabling, but the evidence does not support a higher rating.,The Veteran's type II diabetes mellitus is currently rated as 20 percent disabling, and there is no evidence to warrant an increase in this rating.,Service connection for a colon condition was denied due to lack of current symptoms or diagnosis.,Diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity has been granted service connection but remains noncompensable.,Diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity also has been granted service connection but remains noncompensable.

The deciding factor: The evidence does not show that the Veteran's coronary artery disease results in heart failure symptoms at any level of physical activity, which is required for a higher rating.,The Veteran takes an oral hypoglycemic agent and does not require insulin or dietary restrictions to manage his diabetes. Therefore, he does not meet the criteria for a 40 percent rating under DC 7913.,There is no current diagnosis of a colon condition in the record, and the VA examiner found that any previous colitis resolved with no residuals.,The Veteran's diabetic peripheral neuropathy has been granted service connection but remains noncompensable as there are no current symptoms or evidence of disability.,Similarly to the left lower extremity, the right lower extremity also does not have compensable diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Claimed conditions
Coronary artery disease, Type II diabetes mellitus, Colon condition
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
Camp Lejeune water
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 10, 2024
Citation
A24030297

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24030297.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.