The Board denied service connection for a skin condition, claimed as moles, and remanded the issues of entitlement to service connection for CHF, bilateral lower extremity conditions, bilateral eye disability, and GERD.
The deciding factor: The evidence was not persuasive in showing that the Veteran's current skin condition had its onset during service or was related to his in-service herbicide exposure. The VA examiner found no current CHF disability, but further development is needed for the other issues as there has been insufficient compliance with previous remand directives.
- Claimed conditions
- skin condition, claimed as moles, congestive heart failure (CHF), bilateral lower extremity condition, to include radiculopathy and claimed as bilateral legs and feet disability, bilateral eye disability, claimed as vision, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- October 2, 2024
- Citation
- 24031427
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeals for service connection for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and pernicious anemia, and the Board dismissed both appeals.
- Denied
The Board denied a rating in excess of 10 percent for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as the appellant does not have a documented history of recurrent or refractory esophageal stricture(s).
- Denied
The Board denied the claims for an initial compensable disability rating for right inguinal hernia surgery and service connection for a low back disability, as well as remanded the claims for service connection for GERD and entitlement to an increased rating for hypertension.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for tinnitus and a right hip disability, and granted a 30 percent rating for ureterolithiasis. The claim for an increased rating for PTSD was denied, while other claims were remanded.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.