The Board has decided to remand the case due to the Veteran's failure to appear for a VA examination and because of the need to obtain a medical opinion regarding the relationship between the Veteran's hypertension and service, including his in-service exposure to toxins. The case will be returned to the AOJ for further development.
The deciding factor: The Veteran failed to attend the scheduled VA examination, which is required by regulation.
- Claimed conditions
- high blood pressure (hypertension)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Gulf War
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 1, 2024
- Citation
- 24032567
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 258 · Granted: 30% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24032567.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has granted service connection for cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN) and remanded the secondary service connection claims for GERD, hypertension, sleep apnea, gastritis, headaches, and fatigue as secondary to CAN.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for coronary artery disease, heart disease, diabetes mellitus type II, high blood pressure, bilateral upper and lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, and erectile dysfunction due to a lack of evidence linking these conditions to the Veteran's military service.,Specifically, the Board found that there was no credible evidence of herbicide exposure in Vietnam or any other basis for presumptive service connection.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for diabetes mellitus, hypertension, glaucoma, and hand tremors due to potential exposure to ionizing radiation during service. Clarification is needed regarding whether the Veteran was exposed to TERA associated with his MOS of Army Hercules Fire Control Crew Member at Scott Air Force Base.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for high blood pressure and sleep apnea to schedule VA examinations.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.