The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims of increased rating for bilateral varicose veins, service connection for left knee disability, right knee disability, and right ankle disability due to incomplete evaluations in prior examinations.
The deciding factor: Incomplete evaluations in prior VA examinations prevented a full assessment of the current severity of the Veteran's conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- Varicose veins, right lower extremity, Varicose veins, left lower extremity
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 5, 2024
- Citation
- 24032615
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 719 · Granted: 54% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24032615.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied a compensable rating for bilateral hearing loss and dismissed the appeals related to proposed reductions in ratings for radiculopathy and varicose veins of both lower extremities.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's service connection for generalized anxiety disorder was granted, while several other claims for increased ratings were denied. A 10 percent rating was also granted for certain scars starting from September 24, 2021.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for specially adapted housing and special home adaptation grant are being remanded due to a duty to assist error. The AOJ should secure an addendum opinion addressing the Veteran's total service-connected disabilities, including loss of use of extremities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for evaluations greater than 10 percent for varicose veins in both left and right lower extremities due to a lack of evidence showing persistent edema, stasis pigmentation or eczema, intermittent ulceration, or subcutaneous induration.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.