The Board remands the matter for further consideration and instructions consistent with a Joint Motion for Remand, as the previous VA opinion was found to be inadequate.
The deciding factor: The April 2023 VA opinion did not address direct service connection or secondary service connection adequately.
- Claimed conditions
- tongue cancer, status post radiation, head, neck, and throat cancer
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- November 7, 2024
- Citation
- 24032787
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The appeal was dismissed due to the death of the appellant, and no substitute has been filed within the required timeframe.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal for increased ratings and service connection was dismissed due to a late filing.
- Dismissed
The veteran's appeal was dismissed due to the untimely filing of the Board Appeal request.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the claims of service connection for a skin disability, throat cancer, tongue cancer, and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as there was no valid claim or appeal pending at the time of the Veteran's death.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.