Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's anemia is granted as secondary to service-connected diabetic nephropathy.,Service connection for diabetic nephropathy has been granted with a rating of 80 percent effective November 14, 2022, and 100 percent from July 20, 2023.,The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is rated at 20 percent prior to December 10, 2017, and the claim is denied for higher ratings based on current evidence not meeting criteria for a 40 or 60 percent rating under DC 7913.,Service connection for peripheral neuropathy of both lower extremities has been granted with initial evaluations of 10 percent each.

The deciding factor: The Veteran's anemia is found to be secondary to his service-connected diabetic nephropathy, as supported by a VA examination opinion and corroborated by other evidence.,The Veteran's GFR decreased significantly from November 14, 2022, requiring a higher rating of 80 percent effective that date and 100 percent thereafter due to the severity of his kidney disability.,The Veteran's diabetes mellitus is currently rated at 20 percent based on its current manifestations. The evidence does not meet criteria for a higher rating under DC 7913, as no medical documentation indicates regulation of activities are required.,Service connection has been granted for peripheral neuropathy affecting both lower extremities with initial evaluations of 10 percent each.

Claimed conditions
anemia, diabetes mellitus, type II, peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity, peripheral neuropathy of the right lower extremity
How they argued it
Secondary to another service-connected condition
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
80%
Decision date
November 20, 2024
Citation
24033210

Veterans Law Judge

Emily Tamlyn

Decisions by this judge: 793 · Granted: 28% (granted or partly granted, in the vetted decisions on this site)

Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24033210.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.