The Board has found that another remand is required due to lack of substantial compliance with prior remand directives. The claims for service connection for left and right leg blood clots are being remanded for the provision of adequate secondary service connection medical opinions.
The deciding factor: The Board finds that the previous VA examination and opinion did not provide a clear conclusion with supporting data, as required by Stefl v. Nicholson, 21 Vet. App. 120 (2007).
- Claimed conditions
- left leg blood clot, right leg blood clot, peripheral artery disease (PAD), pulmonary vascular disease
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- December 13, 2024
- Citation
- 24034278
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 24034278.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the Veteran's appeals as untimely, and no service connection was granted or denied.
- Partly granted
The Board granted an initial 100 percent rating for chondrosarcoma prior to November 26, 2021, and denied a higher rating for rib removal. Pulmonary vascular disease was rated at 60 percent effective May 26, 2021, and anterior chest scar was rated at 10 percent effective the same date.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for peripheral artery disease, finding a relationship between the condition and the Veteran's military service.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for pulmonary vascular disease as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected menstrual disorder, resolving reasonable doubt in favor of the Veteran.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.