The Board has determined that further development is necessary for the issues of entitlement to an initial compensable rating for squamous cell carcinoma, right tonsil with asbestosis and extraction of teeth numbers 1, 3, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 30. The AOJ must obtain retrospective opinions regarding the severity of these conditions from the date of award of service connection, January 15, 2010.
The deciding factor: The Board found that a retrospective opinion is necessary to address the residuals of the Veteran's cancer with asbestosis and extraction of teeth since the award of service connection.
- Claimed conditions
- squamous cell carcinoma, right tonsil with asbestosis, extraction of teeth numbers 1, 3, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 30
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- December 19, 2024
- Citation
- 24034448
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 24034448.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for an initial compensable rating for squamous cell carcinoma, right tonsil with asbestosis and extraction of teeth numbers 1, 3, 14, 16, 17, 18 and 30.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected musculoligamentous strain, right knee, is currently rated at 10 percent and the Board finds that a higher rating is not warranted.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.