Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)PACT Act

The Veteran's claims for service connection and increased ratings are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations to address inconsistencies in previous examination reports.,The Veteran's hypertension claim is being remanded as well, with a focus on whether obesity/weight gain resulting from his service-connected disabilities was a substantial factor in causing his disability and if it would not have occurred but for such factors.,The Veteran's bilateral knee disorders are being remanded to assess the current nature and severity of his conditions, including any flare-ups and functional loss due to repetitive use over time.,The Veteran's right ankle disorder is being remanded to determine whether he experiences flare-ups and their impact on range of motion and extension.,The Veteran's service connection for hypertension is being remanded to consider whether obesity/weight gain resulting from his service-connected disabilities was a substantial factor in causing his disability.

The deciding factor: There are inconsistencies in the previous examination reports that need clarification, such as discrepancies between the Veteran's reported symptoms and those observed during the examinations.,The remand is necessary to determine whether obesity/weight gain resulting from service-connected disabilities was a substantial factor in causing hypertension and if it would not have occurred but for such factors.,The remand is needed to assess the current nature and severity of the Veteran's bilateral knee disorders, including any flare-ups and functional loss due to repetitive use over time.,The remand is necessary to determine whether the Veteran experiences flare-ups of his right ankle disorder and their impact on range of motion and extension.,The remand is required to consider whether obesity/weight gain resulting from service-connected disabilities was a substantial factor in causing hypertension.

Claimed conditions
lumbar disorder, hypertension
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 8, 2024
Citation
A24036228

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24036228.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.