The Board denied service connection for a dental disability for compensation purposes because there was no evidence of loss of substance in the upper or lower jaw, and the Veteran had an abscess and replaceable missing teeth.
The deciding factor: Service connection is not available for these disabilities as they do not meet the criteria for compensation under 38 C.F.R. § 4.150.
- Claimed conditions
- abscess, replaceable missing teeth
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 22, 2024
- Citation
- A24039683
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24039683.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for an additional VA examination to determine if the Veteran has additional disability due to a December 2012 surgery and whether such disability was caused by fault on the part of VA.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to unresolved issues regarding the Veteran's post-surgical complications and their relation to VA treatment. The case will be reviewed by a non-VA medical expert to provide an opinion on whether the surgeries caused or contributed to the identified rectal disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to the need for a VA examination to determine the nature and etiology of any current dental disorder.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran is seeking compensation for additional penile disabilities allegedly caused by an unauthorized surgery in December 2012. The Board has determined that the case requires further development to address consent and scope of procedures performed during the surgery.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.