Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Veteran's petition to reopen the claim for service connection for left ankle pain was granted, and he is now entitled to service connection for this condition.,Service connection has also been granted for bilateral pes planus. The Veteran's pre-existing bilateral pes planus was aggravated by his active-duty service.,Service connection for erectile dysfunction (secondary to PTSD) and sleep disorder (secondary to PTSD) have both been granted, with the latter being at least in equipoise as to causation.,The Veteran is now entitled to service connection for a left ankle condition, bilateral pes planus, erectile dysfunction secondary to PTSD, and a sleep disorder secondary to PTSD.

The deciding factor: New evidence was provided by the Veteran that indicated his left ankle pain started during service and has persisted since then. The Board found this new evidence relevant.,The April 2017 VA examination confirmed the Veteran's report of left ankle pain, which is considered a disability for purposes of service connection.,The Veteran's pre-existing bilateral pes planus was aggravated by his active-duty service as evidenced by his discharge due to physical disability existing prior to entry on active duty and not aggravated by service.,The Veteran reported issues with sexual performance at an October 2016 psychology treatment, which led to a diagnosis of erectile dysfunction. The Board found the Veteran's testimony credible regarding this issue.,The June 2017 VA examination indicated that the Veteran has chronic sleep impairment due to his mental health condition (adjustment disorder with depression). The Board found the evidence at least in equipoise as to whether the Veteran's insomnia is causally related to his service-connected tinnitus.

Claimed conditions
left ankle pain, bilateral pes planus, erectile dysfunction, sleep disorder
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
July 25, 2024
Citation
A24041192

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24041192.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.