Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The petition to readjudicate the claim for service connection for back strain (claimed as lower and upper back condition) is granted.,The petition to readjudicate the claim for service connection for left ankle strain remains denied because the evidence submitted is not new and relevant.,The petition to readjudicate the claim for service connection for right ankle strain is granted.,The petition to readjudicate the claim for service connection for hair loss is denied.,The petition to readjudicate the claim for service connection for headaches is granted.,The petition to readjudicate the claim for service connection for neck strain is granted.,The petition to readjudicate the claim for service connection for left shoulder strain is denied because the evidence submitted is not new and relevant.

The deciding factor: New and relevant evidence has been received since the prior decision, warranting readjudication of the claim. The evidence includes VA medical records that tend to prove or disprove a matter at issue in the present claim.,The evidence received since the April 2016 Board decision does not tend to prove or disprove that the left ankle disability is etiologically related to the Veteran's service and is not relevant.,New and relevant evidence has been received since the prior decision, warranting readjudication of the claim. The evidence includes VA medical records that tend to prove or disprove a matter at issue in the present claim.,The evidence received since the April 2016 Board decision does not include complaint, treatment, or diagnosis of a hair loss disability and is therefore not relevant.,New and relevant evidence has been received since the prior decision, warranting readjudication of the claim. The evidence includes VA medical records that tend to prove or disprove a matter at issue in the present claim.,New and relevant evidence has been received since the prior decision, warranting readjudication of the claim. The evidence includes VA medical records that tend to prove or disprove a matter at issue in the present claim.,The petition to readjudicate the claim for service connection for left shoulder strain is denied because the evidence submitted is not new and relevant.

Claimed conditions
back strain (claimed as lower and upper back condition), left ankle strain, right ankle strain, hair loss, headaches, neck strain, left shoulder strain
How they argued it
Not specified
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 1, 2024
Citation
A24042859

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24042859.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.