The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims of service connection for myopathy and proprioception impairment due to inadequate medical opinions. The cases will be returned to the RO for further examination by appropriate experts.
The deciding factor: The initial determinations were based on insufficient medical evidence, specifically inadequate examinations that did not address the Veteran's lay statements regarding continuity of symptoms.
- Claimed conditions
- myopathy, proprioception impairment
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 1, 2024
- Citation
- A24042866
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24042866.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's hypertension was granted service connection, but his myopathy claim for secondary service connection to hypertension was also granted. The decision is mixed as it grants one issue and denies the other.
- Granted
The Veteran developed myopathy, myositis, rhabdomyolysis and other residuals due to statin use prescribed by VA. The Board found that the disability was not caused by or proximately caused by VA's fault or an unforeseen event.
- Granted
The Board has granted the appellant's claims for service connection for left lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, right lower extremity peripheral neuropathy, and myopathy, all of which are presumed to be due to exposure to herbicide agents during military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for a TERA opinion regarding whether the Veteran's causes of death are related to his service-connected conditions and exposure during active duty.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.