The Veteran's pituitary brain tumor and related complications are being remanded for further review due to insufficient reasoning in the July 2020 VA opinion. The examiner is requested to provide an addendum opinion addressing whether the additional disabilities were caused by or resulted from carelessness, negligence, lack of proper skill, error in judgment, or similar instance of fault on the part of the VA.
The deciding factor: The July 2020 VA opinion did not adequately address the Veteran's lay contentions and treatment records suggesting a positive association between additional disabilities and prior surgeries.
- Claimed conditions
- pituitary brain tumor (claimed as brain tumor), hypogonadal hypogonadism, growth deficiency, blurred vision, chronic incomplete tetraplegia, acute diastolic congestive heart failure exacerbation from hypertensive urgency
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 8, 2024
- Citation
- A24045200
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A24045200.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating of left trigeminal neuralgia was granted, and service connection was established for secondary conditions including blurred vision, dizziness, nausea/gastrointestinal symptoms, and sleep impairment.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the previous remand for an addendum opinion addressing whether the Veteran's bilateral primary open-angle glaucoma with bilateral cataract was caused or aggravated by his service-connected sinus headaches and/or allergic rhinitis did not provide adequate opinions. The claim is being remanded to obtain such opinions.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran withdrew his appeals for TDIU and all service connection claims, stating he is satisfied with the decisions made regarding his VA disability rating.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The appeal for service connection and initial rating claims has been withdrawn by the Veteran.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.