The Veteran's left renal cancer is remanded due to the inadequacy of the VA examination and opinion provided, which did not adequately consider his exposure to petroleum products during service.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner failed to provide a comprehensive or adequate opinion regarding the Veteran's exposure to petroleum products and its relation to his kidney cancer.
- Claimed conditions
- left renal cancer
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 9, 2024
- Citation
- A24045403
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24045403.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for left renal cancer and gastric cancer due to herbicide exposure, as the VA examinations provided were inadequate. The Veteran needs new and adequate VA examinations or opinions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for left renal cancer, gastric cancer, and prostate disability are being remanded due to the need for additional development regarding the relationship of these conditions to his military service and presumed herbicide exposure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further examination and development due to unclear presumptive service connection for the Veteran's claimed disabilities, including left renal cancer and gastric cancer.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.