The Board has determined that additional development is needed to address the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. 1151 due to his April 2017 hernia repair surgery, as there are conflicting findings and unclear etiology.
The deciding factor: The VA examiners did not provide a clear opinion on the nature, etiology, and severity of any additional disability found during the examination or if it was caused by VA's fault or an unforeseen event.
- Claimed conditions
- paralysis, lower extremity weakness, unhealed abdominal wound
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 20, 2024
- Citation
- A24048016
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A24048016.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to inadequate medical opinion and insufficient notice under VA regulations. The eligibility for the PCAFC program is being reviewed, with a focus on whether the Veteran requires personal care services, supervision or protection.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for multiple disabilities, including shoulder, elbow, hand, leg, ankle, paralysis, hypertension, tuberculosis, eye, hernia, and vertigo, as there was no evidence of current disability or a nexus to service.
- Dismissed
The appeal was dismissed due to the Veteran's death before filing an appeal to the Board.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date of May 17, 2018, for his 80% disability rating for loss of use of right foot. The Veteran argued that he should have received a higher rating based on peripheral nerve damage from his in-service back surgery, but the evidence did not show an increase in severity within one year prior to filing his May 2018 claim.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.