The Board has found new and relevant evidence that warrants readjudication of the claim for service connection for an autoimmune disorder, including Wegener's granulomatosis, vasculitis, arthropathy, sensitivity to cold, and loss of two fingertips. The case is being remanded for further review.
The deciding factor: New and relevant evidence has been submitted that supports a nexus between the Veteran's current autoimmune disorder and in-service exposures, warranting readjudication of the claim.
- Claimed conditions
- Wegener granulomatosis, vasculitis, arthropathy, sensitivity to cold, loss of two fingertips
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 3, 2024
- Citation
- A24052176
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A24052176.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for a back disorder to obtain an addendum opinion that considers all evidence of record, including lay statements and medical records.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for Wegener granulomatosis and an unspecified anxiety disorder, finding that these conditions are proximately due to the Veteran's exposure to contaminated water at Camp Lejeune during his military service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to incomplete VA examinations and a duty to assist error, requiring further evaluation of the Veteran's left leg sores from vasculitis.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases due to inconsistencies in medical opinions and a need for additional development, including obtaining VA treatment records and scheduling a new VA examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.