The Veteran's right eye disorder is presumed to be related to in-service herbicide exposure. However, the VA examiner did not provide a sufficient opinion regarding the etiology of the condition and thus the claim must be remanded for further evaluation.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner did not provide a sufficient rationale or discussion of the Veteran's lay reports, STRs, SPRs, and treatment records in their opinion on the etiology of the right eye disorder.
- Claimed conditions
- Right eye disorder
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Burn pits / airborne hazards
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 4, 2024
- Citation
- A24052663
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24052663.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for PTSD, MDD with anxious distress, a right eye disorder, and sleep apnea are being remanded due to the need for additional evidence and medical opinions.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for hypertension, heart disorder, kidney disorder, right eye disorder, and acquired psychiatric disorder. The appeals are remanded for further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's daughter is appealing the denial of service connection for peripheral neuropathy of various extremities and a right eye disorder. The claims are being remanded to obtain additional medical opinions regarding the etiology of these conditions, particularly in relation to his service-connected small cell carcinoma and herbicide exposure.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has identified an AOJ error in reducing, severing, and discontinuing the Veteran's VA compensation benefits due to 'fraud' under a regulation that is not applicable to his claims. The issues are remanded for providing a summary of the relevant regulations and readjudicating the cases.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.