The Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder resulted in occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks, but did not meet the criteria for a higher rating due to lack of specific symptoms.
The deciding factor: The evidence showed that during the relevant period, the Veteran experienced some symptoms such as anxiety, depression, and difficulty sleeping, but did not demonstrate significant impairment in social or occupational functioning.
- Claimed conditions
- Acquired Psychiatric Disorder (APD)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 30%
- Decision date
- September 5, 2024
- Citation
- A24053195
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24053195.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for the Veteran's acquired psychiatric disorder, including PTSD, MDD, and anxiety, due to insufficient evidence linking these conditions to his military service.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder, finding that the persuasive weight of the evidence did not support a relationship between these conditions and the Veteran's military service.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder (APD), including PTSD, finding that the evidence did not show a link between the Veteran's current diagnosis and his military service.
- Denied
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings for TMJ with arthritis and APD were denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a rating in excess of 10 percent for TMJ, as his interincisal range was between 30 to 34 mm without dietary restrictions to mechanically altered foods. For APD, the Veteran's disability most closely approximated a 30 percent rating, warranting continued assignment of the current 30 percent evaluation.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.