The Veteran's claims for service connection for urinary tract infection, anonychia of the nails, and dermatophytosis involving the nails have been denied. The claim for chronic abdominal pain is being remanded.,There is no record of any nail anomaly during the timeframe under review in this appeal.
The deciding factor: The Veteran's claims are being remanded due to a failure to request diagnostic/radiology testing, which was particularly remiss given her complaints of chronic abdominal pain. The presumptive provisions at 38 C.F.R. § 3.317 should have been considered.
- Claimed conditions
- Urinary Tract Infection, Anonychia of the nails, Dermatophytosis involving the nails, Chronic Abdominal Pain
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 9, 2024
- Citation
- A24054030
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24054030.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases for further development, including obtaining SSA records beyond medical records and scheduling a VA examination to assess syncope associated with DM and hypertension.
- Granted
The Board granted an earlier effective date of May 29, 2018, for the grant of total disability based on individual unemployability (TDIU).
- Dismissed
The appeal of the issue of entitlement to service connection for urinary tract infection has been dismissed due to the Appellant's withdrawal.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete service records and a need for further verification of the Veteran's lightning strike during service. The appellant seeks service connection for cause of the Veteran's death, which is related to his alleged lightning strike.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.