The Veteran's hypertension and left epididymitis have been rated based on their current manifestations. The Board has found no evidence of a history of diastolic pressure predominantly 100 or more that required continuous medication for control, nor atrophy in either testicle, which would warrant higher ratings under the applicable diagnostic codes. The Veteran's deviated nasal septum and tinea pedis disabilities are remanded for further examination to determine their relationship to service.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not support a finding of a history of diastolic pressure predominantly 100 or more that required continuous medication for control, nor atrophy in either testicle, which would warrant higher ratings under the applicable diagnostic codes. The Veteran's deviated nasal septum and tinea pedis disabilities are remanded to obtain further examination.
- Claimed conditions
- Hypertension, Left Epididymitis, Deviated Nasal Septum, Tinea Pedis with Bullous Lesions, Bilateral Dry Eye, Chronic Pain
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 11, 2024
- Citation
- A24055331
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A24055331.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the claim of service connection for hypertension, finding that it did not manifest during service and is not causally related to the Veteran's exposure to herbicides or service.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for hypertension, finding that there was no evidence of a nexus between his current condition and active duty service or herbicide exposure.
- Denied
The Board has denied service connection for hypertension and has remanded the issue of an increased rating for skin condition.
- Granted
The Board has restored the Veteran's 10% rating for hypertension effective December 1, 2025 and denied a rating in excess of 10%. The reduction from 10% to noncompensable was not proper.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.