The Board has decided that the Veteran's claims for service connection for right and left restless leg syndrome (RLS) are remanded due to inadequate medical opinions, a need to develop toxic exposure risk activity (TERA), and secondary service connection issues.
The deciding factor: The VA examiner opinions were found to be inadequate as they did not consider the Veteran's reports of symptom onset during service or address the synergistic effect of all TERAs on the Veteran. The Board also noted that a TERA opinion is required under the PACT Act for the Veteran's Southwest Asia service.
- Claimed conditions
- right restless leg syndrome, left restless leg syndrome
- How they argued it
- Secondary to another service-connected condition
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 16, 2024
- Citation
- A24056596
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24056596.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the appeals for service connection of multiple conditions including bursitis and sinusitis, as the Veteran's representative withdrew all appeals prior to promulgation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate opinions regarding secondary service connection for right restless leg syndrome, specifically addressing whether it is at least as likely as not that the Veteran's right restless leg syndrome is aggravated by his service-connected peripheral neuropathy of the left lower extremity.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for increased ratings and service connection are being remanded due to the need for additional examinations and consideration of new evidence.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection are being remanded due to a duty to assist error. The Board finds that the evidence does not establish presumptive service connection based on Gulf War Syndrome, and further development is needed to determine if these conditions qualify as undiagnosed illnesses or MUCMIs.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.