The Board has denied the Veteran's claim for service connection for a neurogenic bladder disability, to include as secondary to lumbosacral strain due to lack of current disability.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not show that the Veteran currently has a neurogenic bladder disability at any time during the appeal period or within close proximity thereto.
- Claimed conditions
- neurogenic bladder disability
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 18, 2024
- Citation
- A24057866
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation A24057866.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for adjustment/mood disorder, gastrointestinal reflux disease (GERD), left lower extremity radiculopathy, right lower extremity radiculopathy, and neurogenic bladder disability as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a neurogenic bladder disability was denied because there is no persuasive evidence of a current diagnosis or history of such condition during the pendency of her claim.,Her claim for a compensable rating for GERD was also denied as her symptoms did not meet the criteria for any higher rating under either the old or new rating criteria.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to insufficient evidence regarding the etiology of the Veteran's claimed T-11 spinal cord injury, neurogenic bladder disability, and neurogenic bowel disability. The Veteran is seeking service connection based on aggravation by his service-connected PTSD.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to insufficient medical evidence regarding the Veteran's claimed neurogenic bladder disability, which is being considered as secondary to his service-connected radiculopathy. The Veteran will need a new VA examination to determine if he has this condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.