The Board remands the claim for service connection for a bladder condition, to include as due to the Veteran's service-connected lumbar spine disability, due to inadequate medical opinions regarding causation and aggravation.
The deciding factor: The VA opinions provided are found to be inadequate because they do not address both causation and aggravation, nor do they adequately consider the Veteran's lay statements and medical records.
- Claimed conditions
- overactive bladder syndrome, benign prostatic hyperplasia with overactive bladder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 1, 2024
- Citation
- A24062213
Veterans Law Judge
Decisions by this judge: 2,088 · Granted: 33% (granted or partly granted, in the indexed decisions on this site)
Judge attribution: 2025 complete; earlier years partial.
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Read the original VA decision (opens in a new tab) using citation A24062213.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's request for a temporary total disability rating based on convalescence due to her service-connected back condition is denied as the evidence does not show she was on convalescence leave for three months following her surgery.,Service connection claims for overactive bladder syndrome and removal of left ovary are remanded due to insufficient medical opinions addressing all relevant factors.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's currently diagnosed bladder disorder, including benign prostatic hypertrophy and overactive bladder syndrome, had its onset during his military service. As such, the criteria for establishing service connection have been met.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that a remand is necessary to address the etiology of the Veteran's urological disorder, specifically whether it was caused or aggravated by his service-connected diabetes mellitus.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.